Posted onEdited onInExplorationWord count in article: 1.8kReading time ≈7 mins.
This article introduces unital rings and their ideals, then develops
polynomial rings, quotients, adjoining constructions, product
decompositions, fraction fields, and the prime and maximal ideal
tests.
Throughout, rings have an identity , subrings contain the same identity,
and ring homomorphisms preserve it. Ideals are two-sided unless
specified.
Definitions
Definition. A ring is a set such that is an abelian group, multiplication
is associative, and multiplication distributes over addition on both
sides. A ring is commutative if multiplication commutes. A
division ring is a nonzero ring in which every nonzero element
is a unit; a commutative division ring is a field.
Definition. A subring contains and is closed under addition,
additive inverses, and multiplication. A unit is for which for some ; the units form the group .
Definition. The characteristic of is the least positive integer such that , or if none exists. Here means a repeated sum, not ring
multiplication by an element .
Polynomial rings
Let be commutative. The
polynomial ring consists of
the formal sums
with the usual coefficientwise addition and convolution product. For
, is its largest nonzero exponent;
set .
Definition. A zero divisor is a nonzero
for which for some nonzero . An integral domain is a
nonzero commutative ring with no zero divisors.
Proposition. is an integral domain if and only if
is an integral domain.
Proof. If is a domain
and , the leading
coefficient of is the product of
two nonzero elements, so .
Conversely, embeds as the
constant polynomials, so zero divisors in remain zero divisors in . ◻
Theorem.Division algorithm. Let
, with and leading coefficient a unit.
Then there are unique
such that
In particular, this holds for every nonzero when is a field.
Proof. If or , take . Otherwise write , , , and , and
set
Iteration gives with
or . If also , then
If , then
a contradiction. Hence
and . ◻
There is no ordering-free analogue for arbitrary multivariate
division. Over a field, a chosen monomial order and an ordered list of
divisors give the multivariate division algorithm; the remainder need
not be unique unless additional hypotheses, such as a Gröbner basis, are
imposed.
Homomorphisms and ideals
Definition. A ring homomorphism preserves , addition, and multiplication. Its
kernel is .
A bijective homomorphism is a ring isomorphism.
Definition. An ideal is an additive
subgroup such that
and for every . The ideal generated by is
For a commutative ring, is the principal ideal generated by .
Proposition. Kernels of ring homomorphisms are
ideals. Conversely, every ideal
is the kernel of the quotient homomorphism .
Proof. Additivity makes a kernel an additive subgroup, and
for in the kernel. For the
quotient map, exactly when
. ◻
Proposition. There is a unique ring homomorphism
sending to . Its kernel is , where .
Proof. The unique homomorphism is
◻
Theorem.Universal property of a polynomial
ring. Let be
commutative, let
be a homomorphism, and let . There is a unique homomorphism extending and satisfying , namely
Taking gives the
coefficientwise extension .
This substitution principle extends in the evident way to finitely
many variables.
Proposition. A field has exactly the ideals and . Consequently, every unital
homomorphism from a field to a nonzero ring is injective.
Proof. If an ideal
contains , then , so . The kernel of a unital map from
is not all of , hence it is zero. ◻
Theorem. If
is a field, every ideal of is
principal.
Proof. For a nonzero ideal , choose a monic of least degree. Division writes
every as with ; since , minimality gives . Thus . The zero ideal is . ◻
Quotient rings
Theorem.Quotient ring
construction. If , then is a ring
under
The natural map ,
, is surjective and has
kernel .
Theorem.First isomorphism theorem for
rings. For a ring homomorphism ,
Proof. The map is well-defined,
injective, and surjective onto , and it respects
both ring operations and the identity. ◻
Theorem.Correspondence theorem for
ideals. If is
surjective, is an
inclusion-preserving bijection between ideals containing and ideals of . Its inverse is .
Proof. The mutually inverse correspondences are
with
on the stated domains. ◻
Adjoining elements
Definition. If is a ring containing and , then is the
smallest subring of containing
and . When and are commutative,
Example.The coefficient ring is
preserved. In
the coefficient map is injective because is monic. Thus contains an isomorphic copy of (and a root of ).
Example.The coefficient ring is
destroyed. Let and . In
one has ; multiplication by gives , and then gives . Hence is the zero ring and the coefficient
map is not injective.
The evaluation map ,
, has image , hence .
In an abstract construction , the coefficient map is injective exactly when
; a monic nonconstant
is a useful sufficient
condition.
Product rings and
idempotents
The Cartesian product
is a ring under componentwise operations.
Definition. An element is idempotent if . It is central if for every .
Theorem.Decomposition by an
idempotent. If is a
central idempotent of , then and are ideals and rings with
identities and , and
For a commutative ring every idempotent is central.
Proof. Centrality makes both summands two-sided ideals. The
displayed map is a ring homomorphism. Its inverse is : indeed and every decomposes as . ◻
Theorem.Chinese remainder theorem.
If and , then
is surjective with kernel . Hence .
Proof. Suppose
and choose , with . For every ,
because and
. Thus the map is
surjective. ◻
Fields of fractions
Let be an integral domain. On
pairs with , put when . The class of is written .
Theorem.Field of fractions. These
classes form a field containing an
isomorphic copy of via .
Proof. Define and . Every nonzero has inverse , and is injective. ◻
Theorem.Universal property. If
is an injective
homomorphism to a field, there is a unique homomorphism
extending , given by
Thus every field containing
contains a unique -isomorphic copy
of .
Proof. Any extension must send to the displayed
value, proving uniqueness. Cross multiplication and injectivity of prove the formula is well-defined;
direct calculation proves it is a homomorphism. ◻
Maximal and prime ideals
In this subsection is
commutative.
Definition. A proper ideal is maximal if no proper ideal
lies strictly between and . A proper ideal is prime if implies or .
Theorem. An ideal is maximal if and only if is a field.
Proof. By the correspondence theorem, ideals of correspond to ideals of containing . Thus is maximal exactly when the quotient
has only and itself as ideals,
which for a nonzero commutative ring is equivalent to every nonzero
element being a unit. ◻
Theorem. An ideal is prime if and only if is an integral domain.
Proof. In , exactly when . The absence of nonzero zero
divisors is therefore exactly the defining prime-ideal
implication. ◻